Monday, May 13, 2019

Game of Thrones Watch: 8.5 "The Bells"

Read the previous entry in the series here.
Read the next entry in the series here.


“The Bells”
Written by David Benioff & D.B. Weiss
Directed by Miguel Sapochnik

We’re almost done, you guys. It’s almost over.

This episode had one huge glaring flaw, but overall, it might have been the best episode in the season. The cinematography was gorgeous. The cello work in the score? Brilliant. The acting had me right on the edge of sympathetic tears for the first 15-20 minutes. The tension while everyone’s waiting for the bells to ring—magnificent. The juxtaposition of Arya escaping and Sandor fighting Gregor—amazing. The production crew at all levels deserves every Emmy they’re likely to win this year.

They even gave us some believable character moments. Leaving entirely aside that I don’t think “Cleganebowl” will happen in the books (Sandor’s a much different character there), it makes perfect sense for this Sandor. This Sandor is vengeance personified and knows it, and knows that it’s terrible, and saves Arya from the same fate. He can’t turn back—but Arya can, and does. It was nice to see her humanized a bit.


I initially considered Jaime’s bit in this episode a flaw because it continued the changes Benioff & Weiss have made from the books, changes that I think are detrimental to Jaime’s overall character. However, taken in isolation from the books, it demonstrates a consistency that not a lot of characters in this show have. Would I rather see character development and Jaime stay with Brienne and decide he wants to be a better person than Cersei? Sure. Does it make sense that he doesn’t? Yes. If this is the Jaime they wanted to give us, at least he was an internally consistent Jaime who recognized his own flaws and followed them to their logical conclusion—like Sandor did.

The huge, glaring flaw? One guess.

The showrunners have no idea how to write women, or to write about women. They never have. I’ve said this over and over in this series. Added to this particular weakness is their push to get to the end as fast as possible, which has led to sloppy writing that relies heavily on harmful tropes, especially when it comes to women and people of color.

For Daenerys in particular, there’s an implication that women can’t be trusted with power because they’re too emotional. The narrative wants us to be afraid of her because she keeps burning people alive and not listening to her advisors. But this is the same narrative that had her doing similar things for years and wanted us to view her as a badass. The sloppy writing comes in with the sudden turn in season seven toward the narrative favoring Jon to be king and needing to get Dany out of the way. But when you’ve already set her up to be the rightful queen of Westeros, who’s been working toward that goal and helping people and learning to rule for six years, how do you suddenly change the audience’s sympathies?

By making her “crazy,” of course. Irrational. Emotional. Too unstable to rule. Can’t be trusted with her finger on the nuclear button because PMS or some shit. Not only is this a terrible approach to writing a woman (women, really, because they did the same basic thing to Cersei, minus the dragons), but it’s a horrific way of approaching and writing about mental illness.

The Daenerys they’ve constructed on the show isn’t a sociopath or a psychopath or whatever it is they want us to think she is because of some “gods flip a coin” stuff. Right up until she nukes King’s Landing, all of her feelings are absolutely valid. She listened to her advisors and didn’t immediately take King’s Landing upon arriving in Westeros, and it cost her her fleet and ultimately a dragon (the stupid trip beyond the wall wouldn’t have been necessary if she’d already taken the throne by then). Now her advisors are turning on her. The one person she thought she could trust refused to do the one thing she asked of him, giving said advisors ammunition to turn on her. She lost her best friend. If anything, she’s depressed, and she has every right to be.


What the show is arguing, and has argued pretty much from the beginning, is that mental illness (of any kind) leads to violence. By default. Full stop. Everyone coded “crazy” (I apologize for the abelist language, but that’s entirely the approach the show is taking, especially since they never specify what kind of mental illness they mean) is violent. Aerys. Viserys. Joffrey. Euron. Ramsay. Cersei. And now Daenerys.

That final “snap” into “Mad Queen” even came out of literally nowhere and didn’t fit with anything they’ve given us about Dany up to this point. I’d have believed her destroying the Red Keep after the bells were rung. I don’t believe her just opening fire on the city like that. She’s angry, sure. She’s angry with Cersei for everything that’s happened since she got to Westeros—for losing Viserion, for Cersei not helping with the White Walkers, for Euron killing Rhaegal, for Cersei killing Missandei. So going after Cersei would have absolutely made sense. But even at her most conqueror-y, Dany never just burned down a city for no reason.

So why have her do it? My best guess—they wanted to have a reason for Jon to turn on her. He’s been unflinchingly loyal, absolute in his conviction that he does not want to be king, and they needed a reason for him to flinch.

I suppose we’ll see next week.

Deaths:
Varys
The Golden Company
Euron Greyjoy
Qyburn
Sandor Clegane
Gregor Clegane (for real this time)
Jaime Lannister
Cersei Lannister
Lots and lots of soldiers and King's Landing civilians

No comments:

Post a Comment