Read the next entry here.
As the rewatch moves into a new year, its backward look comes to a close. At least for now...
2.6, "Heart of a Titan"
Written by Aaron Ehasz and Justin RichmondDirected by Villads Spangsberg
Synopsis
She's a fine ship, truly. Image taken from the episode, used for commentary. |
Sad, yes, but resolute--and not wrong. Image taken from the episode, used for commentary. |
Discussion
Someone failed a final saving throw... Image taken from the episode, used for commentary. |
The fight with the dragon depicted in the episode seems to borrow somewhat from Dungeons & Dragons, although correspondences are not exact. (I remark with some joy, though, that the titan's heart looks very much like a d20.) The dragon attacks with a distinct breath weapon (only a few times) and by lashing with its tail; I very nearly expected to see a claw / claw / bite sequence. This is not unexpected, of course; for all its flaws (and it continues to have them, although progress is being made), D&D is a common enough entry point into medievalism, something decidedly engaging and easily accessible, so references to it are able to stand in for the medieval, as such, for a great many.
Such is perilous, of course; post-medieval work necessarily fails to fully capture the medieval from which it borrows and which it may purport to depict, and the constraints of media and genre necessitate selection of concepts to push forward. It is a markedly incomplete portrait that forms when such paints are the only ones used. It remains incumbent upon those who have worked to produce better pigments in more shades to ensure that they are available for use, for those who have done the work to understand (better) what the medieval actually was to point out what is right and what is less so--as the Society has long held, witnessed here, here, and elsewhere.
In the wake of events at the United States Capitol on 6 January 2021, it becomes clearer that the work of medievalists to better understand the medieval and to work against the deployment of wrong-headed, wrong-hearted ideas about it and its significance is far from done. The repugnant ideology espoused by such people as acted against democratic processes while cloaking themselves in trappings of the ostensible medieval, as well as by many others who have done the same as they have acted against peaceful protests and against people who had done no wrong, must be opposed, and those who continue to espouse it must be held in opprobrium. Even in looking at something as seemingly innocuous as a children's cartoon, it must be so--because even in something as seemingly innocuous, wrong-headed, wrong-hearted ideas can be planted, their pernicious seeds taking root and choking out the good lives that others might lead.
No comments:
Post a Comment